Prediction of Antonia Ruzic [116th] vs Chloe Paquet [123rd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W W W L L
Form
W W L W W L L W L WHead-To-Head: Ruzic 0 - 0 Paquet
| Ruzic | Stats | Paquet |
|---|---|---|
| 70% (16-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 35% (7-13) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 116 | Ranking | 123 |
| 114 | Highest Rank | 96 |
| 22 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 7 |
| 68% (182-86) | Career Total W/L | 51% (417-399) |
| $100,614 | Career Prize Money | $442,085 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Antonia Ruzic vs Chloe Paquet Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ruzic 0 - 0 Paquet
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ruzic has won 43.12% of points on their second serve, while Paquet has won 41.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ruzic, in recent form, has won 46.79% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paquet has won 50.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.27% and 31.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ruzic has saved 51.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paquet has saved 49.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ruzic has won 66.15% of matches played (W/L 43/ 22), with Paquet winning 44.78% (W/L 30/ 37) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ruzic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 75% (W/L 73/ 24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Paquet has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 241/ 211), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Ruzic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.75% of matches (W/L 33/ 15), where as Paquet has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.28% of matches (W/L 20/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ruzic has played against opponents with an average rank of 268.94 while Paquet has played against players with an average rank of 251.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ruzic has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paquet has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ruzic has converted 45.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paquet has converted 32.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Antonia Ruzic vs Chloe Paquet Best Odds For The Match
Antonia Ruzic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Julia Avdeeva
Player
Antonia Ruzic
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
15
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
0
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Linda Klimovicova
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
49%
(
34 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Lina Gjorcheska
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Kaja Juvan
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Mia Ristic
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
82%
(
41 of
50)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Karina Miller
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tereza Valentova
Player
Antonia Ruzic
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Tamara Korpatsch
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Chloe Paquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Chloe Paquet
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
77 of
117)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
57 of
77)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
117)
101
Total Points Won
109
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Chloe Paquet
53%
(
63 of
118)
1st Serve %
46%
(
67 of
147)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
16
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
51%
(
28 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
47 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
65 of
147)
136
Total Points Won
129
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Chloe Paquet
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Tamara Zidansek
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
81%
(
54 of
67)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
22%
(
4 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Emiliana Arango
60%
(
66 of
110)
1st Serve %
75%
(
72 of
96)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
49%
(
54 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
51 of
96)
107
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Chloe Paquet
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
46%
(
18 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
46
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Marie Benoit
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Ruzic vs Paquet?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Ruzic Vs Paquet is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68% (182/86) | Win/Loss | 51% (417/399) |
| 64% (392/224) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (977/915) |
| 56% (3069/2424) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (8882/8507) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 343 | Aces Total | 1919 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 716 | Total Double Faults | 2737 |
| 1:29:57 | Average Match Time | 1:12:21 |
| 302.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 218.18 |
| 66% (10800/16404) | 1st Serve % | 59% (23759/40055) |
| 61% (6542/10800) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (15220/23759) |
| 48% (2688/5607) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (7212/16296) |
| 51% (1098/2141) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2150/4742) |
| 48% (7752/16130) | Return Points Win % | 44% (17949/40522) |
| 68% (179/265) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (413/805) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 56% (25/45) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (89/177) |
| 63% (51/81) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (117/259) |
| 90% (177/160) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (437/355) |
| 10% (177/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (437/81) |
| 24% (91/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (379/61) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Chloe Paquet
View full predicted draw for Paquet
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
